A weblog about the politics and affairs of the old
and glorious City of Albany, New York, USA. Articles written and
disseminated from Albany's beautiful and historic South End by Daniel
Van Riper. If you wish to make a response, have anything to add
or would like to make an empty threat, please contact
January 12, 2006
Trying To Cow The Next Governor
A Hearst Watch Article
The Hearst-owned Times Union has begun campaigning
for the as yet nonexistent Republican Party candidate for governor
by attacking Attorney General Elliot Spitzer’s “temperament.” Hearst
content provider Elizabeth Benjamin kicked off the propaganda
piece on Jan 10
on page 1, by saying that Mr. Spitzer “was forced yet again
to address the issue of his temperament, a subject that has
dogged him for weeks.” The article was recycled in some editions
of the newspaper, bad picture of Mr. Spitzer and all, prominently
in the middle of page A3 on Jan 11.
This is an old corporate media trick, one which the Hearst Times
Union managers happily use often. The idea is to get Democratic politicians
to become afraid to speak up or challenge foolish and ridiculous
nonsense floated by Republicans and their corporate media allies.
If the Democrat does challenge their idiocies, then the Republicans
and their media collectively wag their bejeweled fingers and simper, “Temper,
temper.” The Democrat then is supposed to lower his or her
head and whimper an apology.
The tricks pulled by the Hearst Times Union are, sad to say, important.
Although based far away in outer Colonie, and run mostly by managers
who live a 45 minute drive away in Clifton Park and even further
out, the Times Union claims to be an Albany newspaper. And since
Albany is the state capital, the corporate paper’s distortions
and manipulations have an effect on the conduct of state government.
And, sad to say, more than one state Democratic politician has allowed
him or herself to be compromised by their crapola.
It should go without saying that Republican politicos have never
been subject to this technique. For example, current lame duck governor
George Pataki, like many Republican politicians, is known to fly
off the handle uncontrollably if he is challenged, or simply doesn’t
get his way. Here is an example of Pataki’s behavior from an
article I wrote back in 1996 for the Save the Pine Bush Newsletter.
The following quote from the article
is my take on an encounter with Pataki described by notable man about
town and sometimes journalist Jeff Jones, who was working for the
environmental lobbying group Environmental Advocates at the time:
‘Earlier this year, Environmental Advocates (EA), along with
several other groups, issued a well documented "report card" on
Governor Pataki's environmental record. As in most areas of his
failed administration, his environmental conduct was poor, rating
bad in 59 of 78 areas surveyed, and good in only nine. Although
the report was relegated to the back pages of the press, it was
politically devastating .
‘In response, Pataki, during one of his rare
visits to Albany, called the executive director of EA into his
office and threw a tantrum in her presence, yelling at her and
making vague threats. He ended this extraordinary scene by insisting
that as retaliation he would never speak to any of them ever again.
‘Six weeks later, in response to this report, to intense public
criticism, and pressure from Republican Party bosses that he "appear
more green," Pataki presented the state with a hastily drafted
Bond Act, and has been forced to consult with EA and other environmental
groups. Mr. Jones feels that, in the end, issuing the report was
very much worth all of the ruckus it caused. "I learned," he
said, "that you should always tell the truth."’
Do you think that such an embarrassing scene by an enraged Republican
would ever make it into the Times Union? The Hearst corporation would
never have allowed such a thing back in 1996, and it is doubtful
that they would allow it today. Even with declining advertising revenues
because of declining sales, there is still an extreme partisan ideology
among the managers and content providers at the Times Union offices.
After all, the Times Union is, first and foremost, a local corporate
outlet. From time to time the corporate suits swoop down on the local
outlet and demand explanations for slowly but steadily declining
sales. These descents by the suits are inevitably followed by “suggested” changes
to the newspaper and to the local organization.
It seems that during the last round of “suggestions” the
suits imposed a policy of more local inclusiveness. This new policy,
a slight loosening of control of content, is clearly a desperate
attempt to compete with internet journalism.
Yet Hearst and the Times Union are trapped in the Corporate Media
Conundrum. They believe that they must control the information content
of their newspaper, because information is a salable commodity. For
this reason, the content providers at the corporate newspaper must
be controlled by a dictatorial manager, called an “editor.”
But there is a tradeoff. When you have a dictator, the first thing
you lose is flexibility. If all written articles must be presented
to the editor before printing, precious time is lost. The other thing
lost is quality. If articles must follow the political dictates of
the editor or of his corporate bosses, then truth and ultimately
credibility become irreparably compromised.
As for Mr. Spitzer, will he fall for this trick? Will he behave
like John Kerry during his presidential campaign and cower in the
corner, afraid to speak up and challenge the corporate media while
Surely Mr. Spitzer is savvy to these routines, and is made of stronger
stuff. I don’t agree 100% with Mr. Spitzer’s positions,
for example, his preference for centralizing power in the executive,
and his inexplicable support for the scam operations known as “charter” schools.
Yet Mr. Spitzer has consistently demonstrated a strong spine and
an even temperament... qualities that George Pataki has not displayed.
Post * * * Next
This site maintained by Lynne
Jackson of Jackson's